Recent news surrounding the deaths of Rob and Michele Reiner has brought renewed attention to an important but often overlooked area of California probate law. Their son, Nick Reiner, has been charged with two counts of first-degree murder in the killing of his parents, acclaimed actor and director Rob Reiner and photographer Michele Singer Reiner. While the criminal case will proceed in the courts, the situation highlights a clear and long-standing rule in California law: a person cannot inherit from someone they are accused of intentionally killing.
What Is the Slayer Statute?
“Let’s talk about something in California probate law called the Slayer Statute,” Justin explains. “It’s found in California Probate Code section 250.”
At its core, the rule is straightforward:
“If someone intentionally and feloniously kills—i.e., murders—somebody else, that person is not going to be able to inherit from the victim.”
In other words, California law treats the killer as if they predeceased the victim for inheritance purposes. The law is designed to uphold a fundamental principle of justice: no one should financially benefit from committing murder.
A Rule with a Long History
The Slayer Statute is not new. As Justin notes, “This rule’s been around for quite some time.” One of the most widely recognized applications occurred in the 1990s, following the conviction of the Menendez brothers.
Once they were convicted of murdering their parents, “they were not entitled to inherit any portion of the parents’ multimillion‑dollar estate.” That case brought national attention to a rule that has quietly guided probate courts for decades.
How Broadly Does the Slayer Statute Apply?
One of the most important, and often misunderstood aspects of the Slayer Statute is its scope. This is not a rule limited to traditional wills.
As Justin explains, the statute applies to:
Over the years, “the Legislature has amended the statute multiple times to close any loopholes,” making it clear that creative estate planning tools cannot be used to sidestep this rule.
The intent is unmistakable: “The law is not going to allow a person to benefit from murdering another person.”
Why This Matters in Estate Planning and Litigation
In the wake of shocking crimes, families are often left not only with grief but with complex legal questions. Who inherits? What happens to jointly held property? How are beneficiary designations handled?
The Slayer Statute provides a critical framework for answering those questions—but applying it correctly often requires experienced legal guidance, especially when criminal cases are ongoing or when assets are held in trusts, entities, or beneficiary‑designated accounts.
Final Thoughts
Tragic events may bring the Slayer Statute into the spotlight, but its purpose is enduring and principled. California probate law draws a firm line: intentional, felonious killing severs inheritance rights across all forms of estate planning.
To learn more, watch Justin M. Kincheloe, Esq.’s video as he breaks down how the Slayer Statute works and why it remains a cornerstone of California probate law.
If you have questions about probate litigation, trust disputes, or complex inheritance issues, The Estate Lawyers are here to help.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney–client relationship. If you have questions about your specific legal situation, you should consult a qualified attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. This content is provided in accordance with the California Rules of Professional Conduct governing attorney advertising and public communications.