The since-settled estate litigation involving Oscar-nominated director Norman Jewison, whose estate was valued at more than $30 million, demonstrates the importance of taking proactive measures to avoid disputes when working with elderly testators and blended families. Suits filed in California and Canada reportedly had alleged that Jewison’s second wife isolated him from family and coerced him into disinheriting his children.
Who was Norman Jewison?
One of Canada’s most celebrated filmmakers, Jewison was best known for classics like In the Heat of the Night, Fiddler on the Roof, Moonstruck, and The Hurricane. He died in 2024 at age 97. Widowed in 2004 after 51 years of marriage, he had three children and five grandchildren. In 2010, he married Lynne St. David Jewison, who survived him.
Legal Battle Over Jewison’s Will and Estate
Jewison’s sons filed lawsuits in Los Angeles and Ontario, Canada, alleging elder abuse and undue influence by Lynne. Jewison suffered strokes in 2010, at which point Lynne took control of his personal affairs, eventually cutting off communication between him and his children in 2022, the suits claimed. Partial contact was later restored through mediation. The suits also claimed the children were not notified that their father’s death was imminent.
Jewison’s original 2014 will left most of his estate to his children, with a portion to Lynne. But in late 2023, just before he died, he signed a new will that disinherited all three children. Instead, his assets were left to Lynne and a new charity called the Norman and Lynne St. David Jewison Foundation. The sole executor was former Ontario Premier Ernie Eves, a neighbor and director of the foundation alongside Lynne. Lynne and Eves had denied all claims against them.
Understanding Undue Influence
As estate planners know, undue influence occurs when someone exerts overpowering control over a testator, leading them to make decisions that reflect the influencer’s wishes—not their own. It differs from lack of capacity, which involves cognitive decline. Courts consider several red flags, including:
- Dependence on the beneficiary
- Social isolation
- Recent family conflict or bereavement
- Sudden changes to long-standing estate plans
- Simultaneous changes to other legal documents
The allegations in Jewison’s case were never adjudicated, but what has been reported about the case, including his declining health, isolation, dramatic changes to his will, dependence on the beneficiary, would be enough to raise concerns.
According to the Judicial Council of California’s 2025 Court Statistics Report, California’s superior courts handle approximately 45,000 to 50,000 probate-related case filings annually, which includes estate administration, trust disputes, guardianships, and conservatorships. While the report does not break out how many of these specifically involve undue influence, legal experts estimate that a significant portion of contested estate cases—potentially 30% to 50%—raise undue influence as a central claim, especially in cases involving elderly or vulnerable testators.
As for the rate of disinheritance, there are no hard numbers, but one estate practitioner said it is a “ubiquitous problem” in estate planning, while another source says as many as 30% of decedents disinherit family members or leave them unequal distributions.
Preventing Undue Influence
To avoid undue influence, estate planners will want to obtain a medical evaluation of the testator’s mental capacity at the time of any major estate changes. Also important are making sure the testator has independent legal counsel and keeping detailed records of the testator’s intent and decision-making process.
In her paper, Understanding Undue Influence: Protecting Clients and Their Heirs (see Additional Reading below), Amy Gostanian addressed estate lawyers on the subject:
“As an estate planning attorney, you will serve your client best if you know conditions that are most fertile for someone to exert undue influence; remain vigilant in assessing the conduct and motivations of various parties — from family members to caregivers to other attorneys; recognize red flags that signal the presence of undue influence; and, even before litigation becomes an inevitability, consult an estate litigator to get ahead of the issue.”
Addressing Blended Family Dynamics
As many of us know, mixed families can breed emotional and legal complications. Not surprisingly, disinheriting children from previous marriages often leads to litigation. To reduce the risk, estate planners should encourage transparent communication among heirs. Trust structures are useful to balance competing interests. Also, consider no-contest clauses to deter challenges.
Facing an Estate Dispute? We’re Here to Help
The Norman Jewison case is a powerful reminder of how high the stakes can be when conflicts arise over a loved one’s estate. If you are an estate planner or attorney and need to address potential disputes over disinheritances or undue influence, our experienced litigation team is ready to assist you.
Contact us today to discuss your case in a confidential consultation.
Additional Reading
- Download Understanding Undue Influence: Protecting Clients and Their Estates by Amy Gostanian
- “Payment for My Silence”: Journalist Writes About the Pain of Disinheritance
- Music Legend’s Family Bears the Weight of Estate Feud Centered on Financial Abuse and Incapacity Claims
- Estate Planners: Know These Five Red Flags [of Undue Influence]