You’re not fighting over “the estate.” You’re fighting over the house, the one your parents worked their whole lives to keep. Or a family business that one sibling now treats like their personal property. Or heirlooms that have “mysteriously disappeared” since the trustee took control.
These cases feel personal because they are personal. But in California, asset-specific disputes usually turn on a small set of legal pressure points: title and ownership, valuation, possession/control, and the remedy that forces distribution.
At The Estate Lawyers, APC, we focus exclusively on estate litigation. We help beneficiaries understand what actually drives outcomes when the dispute centers on a particular asset, and how to evaluate whether the fight is worth it.
Key Takeaways
- Real property: Disputes often end in a forced sale or buyout. The PRPA (effective Jan. 1, 2023) strengthened buyout rights.
- Hidden assets: Commonly handled by petition, and courts can order transfers.
- Heirlooms/personal property: Outcomes often hinge on valuation. Probate referees appraise many non-cash assets, sometimes turning “sentimental” items into six-figure fights.
- Digital assets: The law treats digital financial assets as unclaimed property, subject to escheat after 3 years of inactivity with required notice.
Understanding the Asset Argument
Most “asset fights” are one of these four problems:
- Ownership: Is this asset in the trust/estate? Who legally owns it?
- Valuation: What is it worth, and who decides?
- Possession/Control: Who’s holding it, using it, collecting rents, running the company, or locking people out?
- Distribution Method: Does it get sold, bought out, divided, or transferred?
Once you identify which bucket you’re in, the legal strategy becomes much clearer.
Real Property: The Family Home and the 2023 Partition “Power Move”
When siblings inherit a house and can’t agree what to do with the property, California law often funnels the dispute toward partition.
What changed under the PRPA (effective January 1, 2023)
California’s Partition of Real Property Act (PRPA) applies to many tenancy-in-common situations and formalizes a process that usually matters most to heirs: value the property and create a structured buyout opportunity.
Key mechanics to know:
- Court valuation via appraisal: the court generally determines fair market value through an appraisal process.
- Cotenant buyout option: after valuation, cotenants who did not request a partition by sale may be allowed to buy out the interests of cotenants who did request sale.
The Cost Question People are Actually Asking
For many beneficiaries, the #1 fear isn’t “Can I sue?” It’s: “Will legal fees eat my inheritance?”
The average partition can cost around $20,000 (with wide variation depending on cooperation and complexity).
That number isn’t a promise, but it’s a useful reference point for evaluating ROI early, before a family home turns into a multi-year litigation sinkhole.
Family Businesses: Valuation and “Legacy Wars” Over Control
Business disputes are different from house disputes because there’s usually an operating entity, an income stream, and a control problem.
Beneficiaries commonly fight about:
- Is the business actually a trust/estate asset? (or was it “left out” on paper?)
- What is the business worth? (and is someone suppressing value?)
- Who controls operations right now? (and can they pay themselves while you wait?)
The Valuation Battlegrounds
California courts don’t value businesses by vibes. Valuation disputes usually come down to competing professional approaches, commonly including:
- Income-based methods (future earnings/cash flow)
- Asset-based methods (net assets, especially for holding companies)
- Market-based comparisons (when comparable data exists)
The outcome often depends on documentation (financials, tax returns, internal books, customer contracts, payroll, distributions) and whether the “operator” is being transparent.
Heirlooms and Sentimental Property Disputes
Heirloom disputes escalate fast because they feel like identity and history, not property. But courts still need evidence and valuation.
Why Valuation Matters
If you want a court to order relief, return, surcharge, damages, equalization, you generally need a defensible value.
California has a built-in valuation system in many estate administrations, like probate referees, appointed by the State Controller, appraise many categories of non-cash estate assets.
Probate referees are required in many formal probate matters and are used to appraise property delivered in an inventory, with statutory timing expectations.
This becomes vital when the other side tries to minimize value (“just old jewelry”) or maximize it (“priceless antiques”) to manipulate distributions.
The “Double Damages” Settlement Lever
If the facts support that someone wrongfully took, concealed, or disposed of estate/trust property in bad faith (and related contexts). The law can impose liability for twice the value of the property recovered.
There’s also appellate authority discussing how this probate code applies in certain elder financial abuse findings without a separate bad-faith finding, another reason this statute can dramatically change leverage.
This law often functions as a case multiplier that forces serious settlement discussions when someone is sitting on property that isn’t theirs.
Digital Assets: The New “Claim It or Lose It” Risk
Digital assets used to be a niche issue. Not anymore.
California’s RUFADAA framework
California adopted the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA), which governs what fiduciaries can request from service providers and how authority is established.
California enacted SB 822 , clarifying that digital financial assets are treated as intangible property subject to California’s unclaimed property/escheat framework.
The chaptered text reflects a three-year inactivity framework, and requires advance notice before the asset becomes reportable.
Why it matters in estate disputes: if nobody has credentials, keys, account access, or documentation, digital value can become functionally unrecoverable, or drift into bureaucratic limbo while heirs fight over authority.
A Beneficiary’s “Case ROI” Process
Before you go to war over a specific asset, run the dispute through a simple evaluation:
1) The Proof Audit
- Do you have documents showing ownership (deeds, account statements, operating agreements, schedules, trust terms)?
- Do you have evidence of control/possession (locks changed, rent collected, items removed, business distributions)?
2) The Value Audit
- What is the asset likely worth today?
- Is there a credible valuation path (appraisal, probate referee valuation, business valuation professional)?
3) The Leverage Audit
- Is there a clean procedural vehicle to force transfer or clarify title?
- Is there punitive exposure that raises the stakes and pressures settlement?
- For real property, does PRPA create a structured path toward appraisal and buyout?
Taking the Next Step With Clarity
Asset-specific disputes are rarely resolved by “being right.” They’re resolved by proving ownership, pinning down valuation, and using the right procedural tool to force action, before the asset is sold, transferred, depleted, or disappears.
At The Estate Lawyers, APC, we litigate California estate disputes for beneficiaries and fiduciaries. If you’re dealing with a conflict over a family home, business interest, heirlooms, or digital assets, we can evaluate the facts, identify the pressure points, and help you decide whether the case is worth pursuing.
Schedule a consultation today!